Borrowed in Brooklyn

Compare branches

Pick any two of the 12 tracked BPL branches to see what they share, what each over-indexes on, and how their adult-fiction tastes diverge.

Or click any cell in the matrix below.

Selected pair: Bedford and Greenpoint have a 41% weighted overlap on adult demand pressure (39 titles tracked at both, 79 at either).

Color scaleVery different (0–20%)Some overlap (21–40%)Fairly similar (41–60%)Very similar (61%+)
Brooklyn Heights
Central Library
Bushwick
Greenpoint
Williamsburgh
Bedford
Crown Heights
Flatbush
Bay Ridge
Coney Island
Kings Highway
Sunset Park
Central / Downtown
Brooklyn Heights1042493834405148365042
Central Library10991237121081012
North Brooklyn
Bushwick429353232323941353535
Greenpoint499354241474850354050
Williamsburgh3812324232414340384442
Central Brooklyn
Bedford343324132313839333537
Crown Heights407324741314449424444
Flatbush5112394843384447354642
South Brooklyn
Bay Ridge4810415040394947394247
Coney Island368353538334235393735
Kings Highway5010354044354446423740
Sunset Park4212355042374442473540
How this works

Each cell is a weighted overlap: across every adult title tracked at either branch, we compare the lower and higher branch demand-pressure values, then divide the sum of shared pressure by the sum of combined pressure. Books with strong demand at both branches count more; books strong at only one branch lower the overlap. Diagonals are self-matches (—). Branches are grouped by region (North / Central / South Brooklyn) for readability, and only the lower triangle is shown since the matrix is symmetric. If a book isn’t in one branch’s tracked pool, that side counts as no observed signal — not proof of zero real-world demand.

Tracked at both
39
Tracked only at Bedford
16
Tracked only at Greenpoint
24
Weighted overlapWeighted overlap compares demand pressure across the books tracked by either branch. For each book, we take the lower and higher branch demand-pressure values across the two branches and divide the sum of shared pressure by the sum of combined pressure. Books with strong demand at both branches count more; books strong at only one branch lower overlap. If a book isn't in one branch's tracked pool, that side counts as no observed signal — not proof of zero real-world demand.
41%
Higher pressure at Bedford
5
Higher pressure at Greenpoint
5

Shared titles

More popular at Bedford

TitleBedfordGreenpoint
Demand pressureBranch demand pressure: bounded 0–100 index combining scarcity (up to 80 pts when 0/N copies are on shelf) and recent movement (capped at 20). When public holds coverage is high enough across comparable books, scarcity is rebalanced to 0–65 and a 0–20 holds component is added.AvailableDemand pressureBranch demand pressure: bounded 0–100 index combining scarcity (up to 80 pts when 0/N copies are on shelf) and recent movement (capped at 20). When public holds coverage is high enough across comparable books, scarcity is rebalanced to 0–65 and a 0–20 holds component is added.Available
51
+15 vs panel avg
0/1
0
36 vs panel avg
1/1
The intruderFreida McFadden
51
+7 vs panel avg
0/1
29
15 vs panel avg
1/2
Fourth wingRebecca Yarros
51
+17 vs panel avg
0/1
33
1 vs panel avg
2/4
51
3 vs panel avg
0/1
41
13 vs panel avg
1/3
62
+3 vs panel avg
0/3
57
2 vs panel avg
0/2

Hover the column headers for the full definition of each metric, or read the full methodology →

More popular at Greenpoint

TitleBedfordGreenpoint
Demand pressureBranch demand pressure: bounded 0–100 index combining scarcity (up to 80 pts when 0/N copies are on shelf) and recent movement (capped at 20). When public holds coverage is high enough across comparable books, scarcity is rebalanced to 0–65 and a 0–20 holds component is added.AvailableDemand pressureBranch demand pressure: bounded 0–100 index combining scarcity (up to 80 pts when 0/N copies are on shelf) and recent movement (capped at 20). When public holds coverage is high enough across comparable books, scarcity is rebalanced to 0–65 and a 0–20 holds component is added.Available
Rejection : fictionTony Tulathimutte
0
37 vs panel avg
2/2
69
+32 vs panel avg
0/4
0
46 vs panel avg
2/2
65
+19 vs panel avg
0/4
All foursMiranda July
0
37 vs panel avg
1/1
54
+17 vs panel avg
1/5
The womenKristin Hannah
0
30 vs panel avg
2/2
54
+24 vs panel avg
1/5
0
10 vs panel avg
1/1
51
+41 vs panel avg
0/1

Hover the column headers for the full definition of each metric, or read the full methodology →

Distinctive to Bedford

TitleBedfordGreenpoint
Demand pressureBranch demand pressure: bounded 0–100 index combining scarcity (up to 80 pts when 0/N copies are on shelf) and recent movement (capped at 20). When public holds coverage is high enough across comparable books, scarcity is rebalanced to 0–65 and a 0–20 holds component is added.AvailableDemand pressureBranch demand pressure: bounded 0–100 index combining scarcity (up to 80 pts when 0/N copies are on shelf) and recent movement (capped at 20). When public holds coverage is high enough across comparable books, scarcity is rebalanced to 0–65 and a 0–20 holds component is added.Available
EmmaJane Austen
59
+6 vs panel avg
0/1
51
2 vs panel avg
0/1
Flirting lessonsJasmine Guillory
57
+51 vs panel avg
0/2
0
3 vs panel avg
1/1
51
~ panel avg
0/1
0
~ panel avg
0/0
The alchemistPaulo Coelho
51
3 vs panel avg
0/1
0
~ panel avg
0/0
51
+22 vs panel avg
0/1
0
~ panel avg
0/0

Hover the column headers for the full definition of each metric, or read the full methodology →

Distinctive to Greenpoint

TitleBedfordGreenpoint
Demand pressureBranch demand pressure: bounded 0–100 index combining scarcity (up to 80 pts when 0/N copies are on shelf) and recent movement (capped at 20). When public holds coverage is high enough across comparable books, scarcity is rebalanced to 0–65 and a 0–20 holds component is added.AvailableDemand pressureBranch demand pressure: bounded 0–100 index combining scarcity (up to 80 pts when 0/N copies are on shelf) and recent movement (capped at 20). When public holds coverage is high enough across comparable books, scarcity is rebalanced to 0–65 and a 0–20 holds component is added.Available
The wedding peopleAlison Espach
0
~ panel avg
0/0
70
+5 vs panel avg
0/6
Martyr!Kaveh Akbar
0
~ panel avg
0/0
68
+6 vs panel avg
0/5
0
~ panel avg
0/0
62
+8 vs panel avg
0/3
My brilliant friendElena Ferrante
0
~ panel avg
0/0
62
+7 vs panel avg
0/3
OrbitalSamantha Harvey
55
+22 vs panel avg
0/1
62
+29 vs panel avg
0/3

Hover the column headers for the full definition of each metric, or read the full methodology →